Originally posted by: chambers
the most logical thing to do would be to conclude that Gai's method WOULD work against itachi also, maybe not the the point where he could beat him but hes certainly the best suited to the task. think about it, if gai can beat out the advantage of kakashis eye, and the main advantage of itachi is that someone has to ACTAULLY LOOK at the eye in order to succumb to that technique, well Gai still counters it by not even looking at his face. so infact Gai's method will be MORE effective when figthing itachi, why you ask? heres why: it is logical to assume that kakashi DOES NOT rely on the sharingan as much as itachi in battle as it tires him out. Itachis focus on the sharingan MUST lead to some weaknes in other areas, no i know there will be some people who will say "you dont get to be the best ninja in the world if you cant defend against physical attacks!", well to be honest thats a valid point, but when you are fighting against someone who specializes in your weakness (and we know its his weakenss becasue its been shown (lee v sasuke, gai v kakashi) to be an effective couter to the technique) it becoms a whole diffrent kettle of fish, not to mention there is NO other person in the village who fight sht esame way as Gai (at least not as good otherwise he would be known to us) we have also never seen a ninja similar to Gai in any other country and the only one who compares is his student, so it snot like Itachi will have huge experince in figthing someone of gais strenght.
so as you can see its PERFECTLY logical, and mut@t@ instead of saying " your wrong about everything, and its not logical....PROVE IT. use reasonable method and examples to PROOVE it. saying well itachi is a lot strong than kakashi is utter BS because Gai counters the very thing that is stronger about him.