Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: more seeders for eps 70

  1. #21
    Dan Mc
    Guest
    Im at 39% I usually leave the window open for atleast 2 days after A download or at least a whole night, but now 39% 0 Kbp\s

    this isn't cool...

  2. #22
    Moonlight
    Guest
    When I started trying to download #70, the tracker was giving me 30-40x the same IP (69.56.211.107) which traced back to an IP owned by "ThePlanet.com", which happens to be the co-location company where GotWoot is hosted from - I wonder what this was all about.

    If it weren't for the fact that the 'junk' IPs that filled the tracker were from the same co-location company that hosts GotWoot, I would have thought this was a DoS of some sort... but unless the tracker is brain-dead, this should not be happening unless it was due to an internal issue - at least not with what appeared to be internal IPs.

    Well, it looks like the tracker was restarted moments ago... let's see if the oddities will come back. So far, I am seeing a much more sane 2-3 IPs that start with 69.

  3. #23
    Moonlight
    Guest
    </div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>*Admits certain things:*
    I presumed we were already using v5, seeing as v6 was simply released without any notification of v5 in the first place.
    [...]
    For instance, just what the hell happened to v5 in the first place?</td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'>
    Probably the same thing that happened to Winamp v4: they skipped a version to highlight how radical a change they think it is.

    </div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>You can shoot me for asking the question, as i probably deserve it, but who exactly is IETF? o_O; related to IEEE in any way?</td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'>
    Internet Engineering Task Force... they&#39;re the ones who take Internet Protocol-related suggestions, weed them out, sort them and make them into standards wherever relevant needs/issues are encountered.

    If IPv5 perplexed you, maybe you should have a look at IETF RFC #1149 (Request for Comments) Internet Protocol over Avian Carrier

    The IETF&#39;s job is to take suggestions and amend the IP protocol specifications when necessary.

    As for what IEEE is, it stands for Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering. (or something very close to that)

    </div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>However i did state that a lot of people aren&#39;t using it because nobody else is[...]</td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'>
    This is the chicken-and-the-egg problem... no need for / cannot use IPv6 until all the software and hardware is upgraded to support it, until then, people with IPv6 with have to make-do with IPv4 bridges unless they are doing point-to-point IPv6 with IPv6 apps.

    Well, this does not have much to do with the original topic so I suppose this is it until the next time the tracker stuffs up with a Naruto release

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •