Nope, just that I recall him saying something along the lines that the post did more harm than good with all the lies, etc. and that she has no idea what she was talking about. Channel already erased that chat portion, else I would've posted it here.
I think this was a bit telling, "I will, however, say that everything I am about to say is information known to me to be as factual as I perceive them to be." Seems like an unreliable narrator.
Not that I care, a group doesn't owe anyone an explanation. Historically groups just fade away without much hoopla and fanfare, so this was unnecessary.