Arifureta Shokugyou de Sekai Saikyou

[shinta|hikari]

I have a few questions as well for clarification:

Do you mean that liking 2D lolicon fanservice even if you are not attracted to real children at all should be enough to be classified as a pedophile?

Or do you mean that people who like 2D lolicon fanservice automatically means they are also attracted to real children?

I'm just trying to understand why you are adamant about including fictional characters as a way to diagnose this disorder when it wasn't explicitly stated in the definition.

You are basically saying that pedophiles can't get errect from seeing 2D pictures of children.

I did NOT say this. I said some pedophiles can't get aroused by 2D, some do. Some who are aroused by 2D can't get aroused by real people, some do. Humans are complex creatures.

It serves no one to generalize everything about a person just because of one characteristic.

Pedophilia is a complex disorder that has many criteria required to be met. You don't even need to zero-in on the fictional vs real aspect to establish that liking 2D lolicon fanservice is NOT a criteria for pedophilia. The condition of acting on it or being distressed by it also have to be met, which I doubt is being met in most cases of fanservice lovers.