Is it!??!?!?!?!It's pretty clear fictional children are not the ones being talked about here.
Either we are misunderstanding each other or I don't know anymore
I really don't know what you are trying to say here.
You are basically saying that pedophiles can't get errect from seeing 2D pictures of children.
When most of the world has no trouble seeing sexualized 2D content as such and get errections from fictional tits and sex scenes.
Whether we talk about comics, anime or computer created content.
Can anime be sexist, after all - sexes are a thing for "real people". The same connection I make when I see the glorified male MCs and oversexualizied female characters in anime can pedophiles make when they see 2D-child pornography.
I refuse to believe a pedophile's brain is the exception until I see a clear definition of it saying that mentions "fictional and 2D imagery of children doesn't trigger this phenomenon or do nothing to satisfy the sexual urges".
The reason being that 2D imagery is also on the radar and discussed about and in some cases even illegal to distribute.
In fact, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gmo-knVzuU0
That guy basically said that he uses 2D images and hentais with children to satisfy his fantasy.