Arifureta Shokugyou de Sekai Saikyou

[shinta|hikari]

Pedophilia is exclusive to real people and is a primary or exclusive attraction to prepubescents. People who like little kids sometimes but prefer mature women are NOT pedophiles (strange, I know, but that's what it is).

2D lolicon fanservice is:
1) Fictional
2) Not referring to a psychiatric disorder
3) People who do like it are not necessarily primarily or exclusively into it
4) I repeat, Fictional

Liking lolis in anime is also not equal to being attracted children in real life. Just like how liking action movies doesn't mean you want to seriously or will kill people. Same goes for video games.

And to add, a lot of people seem to associate the term pedophile as someone who does sexual acts with children, but that is completely inaccurate. Pedophilia is a disorder, not an action or a crime. If you do sexual things to a child, that's rape, child abuse, statutory rape, etc.

EDIT:
Did you seriously just say it doesn't matter if it's fiction or not? That's a very important distinction.

[MFauli]

EDIT:
Did you seriously just say it doesn't matter if it's fiction or not? That's a very important distinction.

In this context it doesnt matter.

Disclaimer: Im against censorship and I think everything should be legal when its fictional.

When we fap to hentai, real or fictiinal doesnt matter. So dont act outraged here. Whether fictional or not, shes shown in stark pedophilic imagery. If the anime just wanted to show their relationahip, it could do so without showing us her naked body. At least use subtle camera angles. The way it us, kt is full-on peso material and lets call it what it is.

Now, thats oK. I think pedophiles should have fictional stuff, because if you deny them even fiction, its no surprise many eventually go rape real children. But: I dont have to like such material, do i. And since ita gotten worse recently, i calles that out.

[KrayZ33]

You already stated that the person is a pedophile, meaning he/she already satisfies the criteria. This person liking 2D porn is irrelevant at that point.

shouldn't that person be categorized 2d-lophile then (I'm sure there is a term of that too).
After all, his/her primary focus is on 2D pictures of young children.