...what?
I know the latest hulk was a sort of reboot ( right? ) but i found it much more entertaining than the previous one w\ eric bana... but I dont think switching actors is good for the avengers.
it will hurt the movie to just throw in a new actor. UNLESS they introduce them before hand.
Ed Norton was simply a pain in the ass to work with from what I gather. I remember that there were some huge problems with his Hulk movie. No real surprise really.
______________________________________
"Always be yourself... unless you suck."
he looks like a mix betweent eric bana and edward norton.
im curious as to why/how norton was an asshole...is he a diva on set, or is he just batshit crazy like mel gibson?
It's quite a weird situation. Sources are claiming that it's a financial reason, that talks had been good before the contract talks began recently to reprise his role with The Avengers and take part of Comic-Con.
I just remember that there were some issues with Norton not being happy with how the movie was turning out or something with The Incredible Hulk, and he was throwing his weight around to change things, etc. I might be misrembering though, but I'm pretty sure that there were some unhappy moments that made it to the public.
I don't know what to believe... I think there's a bit of truth in all of it.
Couldn't they just get Eric Bana to do it then claim the Avengers movie just follows on from the original Hulk movie? *shrug*
I think I know precisely what I mean
when I say it's a schpadoinkle day
Here's a picture of Thor and Odin in the Thor movie.
______________________________________
"Always be yourself... unless you suck."
assertnfailure (7:40:03 PM): dude....your posts are a bunch of nonsense
Thor is probably one of the most powerful entities in the Marvel Universe.
______________________________________
"Always be yourself... unless you suck."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100725/...c_con_avengers
Samuel Jackson announces case of ' Avengers ' @ comic con.
Hulk to be played by Mark Ruffalo as Penners post indicated... I still wanted Norton to stay
I'm not so bothered by this chance as I might have in other occassions. When I think Hulk I rarely just associate it with Norton, so that a different actor will be playing Hulk next doesn't really bother me much to tell the truth.
Neither of the actors for the Hulk so far have made me feel like, "Yep, that actor looks, and acts exactly as I thought Bruce Banner would."
Video of the full cast announcement of 'The Avengers' at Comic-Con
Damn this movie is going to be INSANE!
______________________________________
"Always be yourself... unless you suck."
I think we've seen before when there are too many superheroes/villains in one movie, it's a mess of a storyline and there's shit for character development. I don't see how they'll avoid that with this movie.
“For God will not permit that we shall know what is to come... those who by some sorcery or by some dream might come to pierce the veil that lies so darkly over all that is before them may serve by just that vision to cause that God should wrench the world from its heading and set it upon another course altogether and then where stands the sorcerer? Where the dreamer and his dream?”
I think the idea of launching all of the solo movies before doing the avengers was great...
You really wouldn't necessarily need charactor development at that point because the Avengers movie would be a sort of sequal...
But it may come down to iron man being the only really stand out charactor, if the others have to establish or re-establish themselves into the storyline.
I have a good feeling Whedon will pull this off. Renner as hawkeye is probably what I'm looking most forward to, apart from everything.
Even with all the other heavy names around him I feel like they can't help but give Hawkeye's character some dimensions just on Renner's acting talent alone. Which to me is great cause Im not all that interested in seeing it just focusing on the big three that already have their movies.