The Internet

[darkshadow]

no she actually says bitches, keep listening.

[Killa-Eyez]

Correct, she asks the girl kindly to quit calling "us" bitches but then contradicts herself @ 1:20 saying guys to be honest and move on to the next "bitch" and again @ 2:23 saying "...if you have a douchebag-boyfriend or you're a douchebag-bitch...".

Dem bitches main.

[rockmanj]

Ah...did not listen that far in...

[Archangel]

Ah...did not listen that far in...

Can't blame you, it's quite the chore to listen to all that gibberish

[darkshadow]

>.>

[Buffalobiian]

>.>

lol, it's not about what HE or other men think what "sucking dick" means, it's about what the original girl meant.

[darkshadow]

irrelevant; overruled; continue.
Her point was never so much about "sucking dick" in the first place; you are listening as selective as dem bitches mayne ;P.

[Buffalobiian]

irrelevant; overruled; continue.
Her point was never so much about "sucking dick" in the first place; you are listening as selective as dem bitches mayne ;P.

If you insist so, then "her point" was never clear. That much is evident from all the differing opinions on what she "meant". The only way one could say that "sucking dick" definitely meant "be accommodating towards" is if that phrase is common slang.

And if her point was never so much about sucking dick, then she shouldn't have mentioned it in the first place. If she didn't mean it, it's her fault for saying something she didn't mean.

[darkshadow]

Oh god, selective listening 2.0; her point was about bitches being annoying and controlling.

[dragonrage]

Fight, fight, fight.

The Gamer vs. The Pedo.


The Internet.

[Buffalobiian]

Don't flame, D.Rage.DS, the one being selective is you. I'm listening to everything she said. If she didn't mean 'suck cock', don't say it. Just because her overall point wasn't about sucking cock doesn't mean it's alright to ignore or gloss over something she said.

[dragonrage]

Why are you so fixated on "sucking cock", Buff?

The video that started this discussion is comical and her point of view is somewhat immature and inexperience but she posted what she felt about how she feels "b!t@he$" should treat their "man". It's not just about "sucking cock" (just put it there since you seem to like that phrase) so stop paraphrasing.

Dr. AgE out.

peace, love and respect to those that deserve it.

I'm more inclined to agree with the initial video than the majority of the responses.

I knew it, Sapphi is a guy trapped in a woman's body.

[Buffalobiian]

Why are you so fixated on "sucking cock", Buff?

I'm not. I just choose not to ignore it.

The video that started this discussion is comical and her point of view is somewhat immature and inexperience but she posted what she felt about how she feels "b!t@he$" should treat their "man". It's not just about "sucking cock" (just put it there since you seem to like that phrase) so stop paraphrasing.

I didn't paraphrase. I never said her point/vid was just about sucking cock. I specifically said it was a part of what she said. A part that is not to be taken as a whole nor simply discarded as being insignificant. Just because I didn't comment on the rest of her speech doesn't mean I denied its existence or value.

[dragonrage]

I'm not. I just choose not to ignore it.I didn't paraphrase. I never said her point/vid was just about sucking cock. I specifically said it was a part of what she said. A part that is not to be taken as a whole nor simply discarded as being insignificant. Just because I didn't comment on the rest of her speech doesn't mean I denied its existence or value.

What was your motivation to focus and fixate on that part of her speech?

[darkshadow]

[Killa-Eyez]

In agreement with Assertn, I'd like to point out that the vid with the 3 women reply, the 2nd eventually says that if your man doesn't tell you where he's going when you ask him, he's up to some shit. That's pretty distrustful.

Edit: Just realised that linking stuff like this gets me in trouble.

[Sapphire]

if your man doesn't tell you where he's going when you ask him, he's up to some shit. That's pretty distrustful.

If you avoid answering an innocent question like "where are you off to?" that can be suspicious. But of course the question can seem invasive if you are someone like me who likes freedom and going where I want when I want, without my cell phone. (I would rather go wherever I want and do whatever I want than be in a relationship where you have to pay attention to the other person all the time.)

[Buffalobiian]

What was your motivation to focus and fixate on that part of her speech?

I chose to respond - and not to "that part of her speech" per se, but to this guy's comment about that particular part of her speech.

My response can be seen here:

>.>

lol, it's not about what HE or other men think what "sucking dick" means, it's about what the original girl meant.

To which DS wrote:

irrelevant; overruled; continue.
Her point was never so much about "sucking dick" in the first place; you are listening as selective as dem bitches mayne ;P.

And the conversation that resulted was as follows:

If you insist so, then "her point" was never clear. That much is evident from all the differing opinions on what she "meant". The only way one could say that "sucking dick" definitely meant "be accommodating towards" is if that phrase is common slang. And if her point was never so much about sucking dick, then she shouldn't have mentioned it in the first place. If she didn't mean it, it's her fault for saying something she didn't mean.

Oh god, selective listening 2.0; her point was about bitches being annoying and controlling.

The next immediate post was made by you D.Rage, so I trust I don't need to repost that.

Going back to my motivation behind my responses:

1) My first response was in regards to the man in the youtube video talking about how he thought "sucking dick" didn't literally mean the act of putting a penis in your mouth and sucking it. My response commented that it is what the girl herself meant when she said talks about sucking dick, not how he or other people think it's a stand-in for something else.

2) My Second (and perhaps the following) comments were in response to DS's comment that it's "irrelevant", that it's " selective listening", because "her point was about bitches being annoying and controlling"

I believe the meaning of "selective listening" is something along the lines of "to (either voluntarily or involuntarily) choose to listen to various sections of a speech or conversation rather than digesting it as a whole". Feel free to correct or challenge that.

To say a certain section, part or phrase of the girl's speech was "irrelevant" because "her point was about bitches being annoying and controlling" - and then calling others out for "selectively listening" - Responding to that was the motivation behind my (latest) comments.

[Sapphire]

Don't you think you're being a bit uptight when you write a dissertation on blow jobs?

[Buffalobiian]

Don't you think you're being a bit uptight when you write a dissertation on blow jobs?

I wrote a dissertation to explain the meaning and motivations behind my posts - and to clarify that I wasn't fixated on blow jobs. The dissertation is about the integrity and reasoning behind my posting - not so much the girl and her vid.

Besides, the post is only 257 words minus quotes. The quotes were mostly there to explain how the conversation came about - and I admit that shouldn't have to be done because it's assumed that readers can read.