Quote Originally Posted by Animeniax
The articles linked are puff pieces for the CBLDF, so they may not have all the facts of the case, or choose not to present them all. Of course, if they did know the facts and decided to ignore the legitimate charges and defend the guy based solely on their support of the manga, if and when the facts come to light, it will hurt their cause more than help. So maybe there was no real kiddie porn?
1:07cr030 USA v. Christopher S. Handley
" CONCLUSION
(...)
There is no dispute the images in this case do not involve real
children (...) "
I'm aware that the last post in this thread is 3 months old, but I think it was important to clarify this matter.