Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: HDMI cables

  1. #1
    What's up, doc? Animeniax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    In my cubicle
    Age
    52
    Posts
    7,055

    HDMI cables

    Is an HDMI cable an HDMI cable an HDMI cable, or do you get what you pay for? I got a $15 one from Belkin and it seems to work fine. I've never believed in buying the expensive Monster cables, but I don't know much about HDMI so maybe it matters.


    For God will not permit that we shall know what is to come... those who by some sorcery or by some dream might come to pierce the veil that lies so darkly over all that is before them may serve by just that vision to cause that God should wrench the world from its heading and set it upon another course altogether and then where stands the sorcerer? Where the dreamer and his dream?

  2. #2
    Burning out, no really... David75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Paris & Versailles, France
    Age
    48
    Posts
    4,954
    Quote Originally Posted by Animeniax
    Is an HDMI cable an HDMI cable an HDMI cable, or do you get what you pay for? I got a $15 one from Belkin and it seems to work fine. I've never believed in buying the expensive Monster cables, but I don't know much about HDMI so maybe it matters.
    Well, the debate is unclear for short cables yet.

    For longer ones, you may eventually have a restricted colorspace, ie colors not as deep as what you should get. For some reason HDMI isn't "all or nothing" as it should be for purely numerical transportation of AV data.

    Then you have several flavors of HDMI, I may be sligtly wrong:
    HDMI 1.1
    HDMI 1.3a
    HDMI 1.3b
    HDMI 1.3b cat2

    The .3x are said to be able to carry better sound quality such as uncompressed numerical formats (True HD, Master HD)
    the .b I think is the one having the capability to transport the best colorspace is available from the player/disc and TV/projector

    I thnink that the Cat2 part is for the quality of the cable, or the ability to have even better resolution than FullHD@60Hz

    I may be wrong, but you get the idea that marketing is pretty fucked up ever since the introduction of high resolution "market"...

    You'll understand it's hard to answer regarding your particular cable, but be aware that your player and TV must be up to the HDMI 1.XY format to use the max settings, the disc itself then has to be encoded with the fancy features too.

    All the things I really like to do are either illegal, immoral, or fattening. And then: Golf.

  3. #3
    Banned darkshadow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Phantom Zone
    Age
    38
    Posts
    4,117
    There is no difference between hdmi 1.3a-1.3c, all hdmi cables, even the 1.0 ones can display 1200p@60hz no problem, the 1.3 ones can just go to 1600p@75hz and have a lot more support for stuff like bitstreaming trueHD, masterHD audio like david75 said.
    Again, there are no feature differences between 1.3a-1.3c.

    And about differences between cables, digital is digital, all the data that gets output, is the exact same data that arrives at the input.
    The only bad thing about digital cables is, that if there is a fault in the cable, that data is lost forever.
    The monster cable types do have perfect cables but they are very overpriced, so if you don't notice anything odd with your lowerprice cable, I say stick with it.
    -----------------

  4. #4
    Monoprice.com has really good prices on HDMI cables.

    And I actually found a 6ft HDMI from biglots for $12, which is more than Monoprice, but no shipping...

    assertnfailure (7:40:03 PM): dude....your posts are a bunch of nonsense

  5. #5

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •