Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: CoreAVC vs Libavcodec

  1. #1
    Burning out, no really... David75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Paris & Versailles, France
    Age
    48
    Posts
    4,947

    CoreAVC vs Libavcodec

    Decoding HD h.264/AVC files may be difficult for some computers.

    CoreAVC markets its superiority in decoding speed and is not a freeware.
    On the other hand libavcodec is gnu (I think) at least free and part of ffdshow.

    I use both, in fact I use CoreAVC most of the time for HD
    Recently, I've discussed a problem with image turning into garbage due to the presence of kanji for ep 24 of Macross Frontier by GG.

    This was a libavcodec problem, that disapeared when ffdshow is updated to the latest build (2094 stable beta)

    Edit: had a problem with 2094 beta, updated to 2110



    What do you guys use/prefer/think?
    Last edited by David75; Sun, 09-21-2008 at 11:35 AM.

    All the things I really like to do are either illegal, immoral, or fattening. And then: Golf.

  2. #2
    Banned darkshadow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Phantom Zone
    Age
    38
    Posts
    4,117
    I think it depends on the player, on my old pc coreavc was faster, like a lot faster with some things, but there were times watching anything then with wmp11 would turn into a lag fest, also some things weren't as smooth as with libav.
    If it works, coreavc is super fast, but when it doesn't its super crap, at least libav is about the same always.
    -----------------

  3. #3
    I've always used libavcodec because my computers have always been fast enough to decode H264 without problem.

    In the early days when there was only SD H264 encodes, my Athlon 64 handled that no problem. By the time HD became popular, I had already upgraded to Core 2 Duo, which decoded that without breaking a sweat. My current computer can handle 1080p H264 using libavcodec with only around 60-70% CPU usage, so it'll be a while before I need a faster decoder or a faster computer.

  4. #4
    Procacious Polymath Ryllharu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    American Empire
    Age
    39
    Posts
    9,884
    My old computer (2.66 Ghz single core) used to cry when playing HD videos. So, figuring that I could get another year or two out of my old PC, I downloaded a cracked version of CoreAVC.

    Huge difference. Finally the videos could play without stuttering, and run well on my machine. Except for gg's videos. Always during the OP when they have two separate lines of karaoke, it would still slow to a crawl and fall out of sync. Part of it was gg's inefficient encoding, the absurd filesizes they have grown into, and my computer just getting old. So I payed for the upgrade to CoreAVC 1.7, and they eventually upgrade to 1.8.

    1.7 made it much more tolerable. The OP sequences would only be half a second out of sync, and the ED's strangely always worked now. I would never had to track into the main part of the video to resync under any circumstances. Other HD broadcasts played smoothly too. With 1.8, the issue was completely gone.

    CoreAVC make the playback so much more efficient. I found it to be well worth the price on my ageing machine. Now I have a Quad core, but I still had two downloads of it anyway.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •