No, I'm afraid you just don't know how to comprehend.

You posted:
Quote Originally Posted by Animeniax View Post
Eating out of cans is bad for your health. Besides the preservatives and generally low quality of canned foodstuffs,the cans are lined with chemical layers to prevent interaction between the food and the aluminum/steel.
And then failed to connect any of the dots in my subsequent posts.

The studies don't show what BPA actually does to the body. In rodents, who can't process it as well, overloaded with the stuff, it disrupts their endocrine system, which was reported widely by the media as something harmful to humans and what you alluded to here.

The truth is, as the FDA put it, that we have no idea about the effects of BPA on humans because so very little of it stays in the body. The levels that are not processed out by our liver or renal system are barely detectable.

Also at no point did you ever attempt to even make the point that studies will frequently show different results. Nor to the reports actually show conflicting results. It's the media, just like you, not understanding what the studies actually say any throwing out a lot of words like "may" and "could be harmful." Except you leave out the "may" and just say "are".

Even the goodhousekeeping article you originally posted goes into detail about what the diet intervention study shows and what it doesn't, in plain English, sectioned off for easy reading comprehension. Something you never noticed.