Member Of The Month

[Deadfire]

Lame. I already have most of those things

LOL, I wish i did

Also, can a mod even be a winner?

It's possible

Everybody has temp rep (except some new people who have no rep). The rep comes and goes, so some of it is always temp. And considering there are no default sigs or avatars (unless you count emptiness), Assertn also has those customized. He also has his name in a list of somekind, the mods list... (har har).

Seriously, though, I think a custom title (chosen by the winner himself) is pretty much the only viable prize there could be. If the admins are willing to grant such to an ordinary member. When even the mods have only a boring "moderator" title instead of one of their own choosing, I'm not so sure they are happy with the idea of dealing out those.

Well, you are right being limited with the resources on hand, sort of doesn't leave much to think about. Look at it this way, a prize is what you make it, what ever it is. Sort of like life is what you make of it, If you go to a movie thinking its crap you will come out thinking the same. The point I guess is what ever the prize turns out to be it's up to the end-user to think it's worth it

I'm a fan of the shit poster of the month idea, I love reading bad things and laughing at the ass that wrote them. However I either have no sense of judgement or rarely browse forums with bad posters, since I rarely see posts that I think are really bad, except noobs who didn't read the rules and don't have a lick of common sense (I didn't read all the rules, but I don't think it's that hard to not be an idiot).

However, back to good poster of the month, even if their's no "good" prize for the winner, just recognizing them and displaying why they are a good poster might be a help to other people who want to be good posters. I've been trying to figure out what makes a post good and useful since I got here and I fall on my ass all the time, a big recognizeable role model might help others in similar situations.

On the first point I agree but me and the other Mods can't just leave these posts un-edited and let everyone flame the living daylights out of him. There will be a issue, with no good side to look at it. Of course making like a "wall of shame" to display those posts us Mods have found to be the worst posts ever made here, that idea I wouldn't have any problems with. On your second point A good poster does raise the bar, and recognizing this is one of those things I wanted to get across with this idea. If everyone gave a little more effort in their posts not to be shit, everyone would follow. Their maybe those that don't but for the most part it helps the forum finding new members that will be more likely to post like the rest of the forum.