Sorry if I made you feel like it was a personal attack. Wasn't my intention. However, I didn't ever say you were wrong. I just tried to offer some half-joking explanation why he was still wearing the helmet. The real reason no doubt was the fact the director didn't notice the inconsistency or it was because most of the time he had been wearing the helmet in battles, and so seeing him without it might make a part of the audience, however unjustifiably, annoyed by its absence.

But for me, it's just that I rather come up with some fictitious explanation instead of the real one. I suppose that was the clash between our thoughts.