nope, i guess he wasn't who he seemed to be.
A friend just saw the movie and he said it was probably the one out of the 4 that followed the book most closely. Cool. Perhaps it has something to do with the new Director.
<@Terra> he told me this, "man actually meeting terra is so fucking big", and he started crying. Then he bought me hot dogs
well i personally thought this book was one of the best, i think it had the most intense fighting (or very close, its a competition between book 4 and 5) so if it follows that storyline we'll get to see a lot of cool action.
LaZie made this...a long time ago.
"It was a very depressing time in my life, since I had no money I was unable to screw the rules" -Kaiba
i heard that in Manhatten in NY had Harry Potter at 12 midnight yesterday or tonight only for 1 day o.O
I am so gonna read the 5th book after I see this movie. My Harry Potter fandom is slowly returning.
<@Terra> he told me this, "man actually meeting terra is so fucking big", and he started crying. Then he bought me hot dogs
wow, this movie sucked compared to the book
Exactly. They were unable to portray Sirius Black in a proper way to the same goes for the rat guy(forgot his name) In the book it was stretched out and hinted at etc. etc. but in the movie they just kinda threw everything in your face and before you had processed it they threw something new.Originally posted by: NarutoMaster
Agreed, the books are WAY better than the movies, but they are fun to watch. Perfect case where the books > the movies is the third movie. Prisoner of Azkaban just felt like the scenes were just switching from one to the next, they just didn't flow properly like in the first one.Originally posted by: PSJ
the books are alot better.
saw it today. It was pretty decent but alot of the new characters were useless
So how much was cut? I figure that they had to remove huge amounts of parts from the book since it's freakin huge.
--------------------------------"THE DROPOUT CREW"-------------------------------
___________________Captain Dropout For Life__________________
I've heard there is absolutely no mention of the House Elves. I'm not sure on the rest though.
It'd be nice if people who actually saw the movie and have read the books could add more to the discussion.
<@Terra> he told me this, "man actually meeting terra is so fucking big", and he started crying. Then he bought me hot dogs
well thats kinda gay, S.P.E.W. is kinda what drives hermonie to make the D.A. in the 5th book (think about the S.P.E.W. organization) and also, her making of weird wool thingys.
LaZie made this...a long time ago.
"It was a very depressing time in my life, since I had no money I was unable to screw the rules" -Kaiba
Just talked to the same friend (and hard core HP fan) who saw the movie yesterday:
Some differences he listed:
1. The world cup is never actually shown. Just the beginning, and then after the victory before the Death Eaters show up and start fucking things up.
2. The Triwizard Tourney starts immediately after their arrival at Hogwarts, just after the sorting.
3. The first task is cut down a lot. You don't see anyone injured, and you only see Harry's dragon, and the miniature of Fleur's.
4. Neville gives Harry the Gillyweed instead of Doby.
5. They never reveal Rita Skeeter as an Animagus, and the whole side-story of Hermione trying to outsmart her is missing.
6. The maze has been changed quite a bit. There are no obstacles like the Sphinx.
7. A few characters are missing, like the house elves and Ludo Bagman.
And in general, they seem to skip from task to task, leaving out a lot of in between stuff. But that's probably for time purposes.
<@Terra> he told me this, "man actually meeting terra is so fucking big", and he started crying. Then he bought me hot dogs
yes, also barty crouch jr. is put in very early and is shown in the riddle house. There was no "school", the whole movie practically revolved around the Triwizard Tournament (except Moody's lesson). Harry flies out of everyones view in the first task. The third task is crap because there is no obstacles except hedges. Harry wakes up at the Weasley's house instead of having them pick them up at his aunt and uncle's house. A lot of things were cut. I understand this was for time constraints, but I would have rather seen a 4 hour movie with all the cool stuff.Originally posted by: XanBcoo
Just talked to the same friend (and hard core HP fan) who saw the movie yesterday:
Some differences he listed:
1. The world cup is never actually shown. Just the beginning, and then after the victory before the Death Eaters show up and start fucking things up.
2. The Triwizard Tourney starts immediately after their arrival at Hogwarts, just after the sorting.
3. The first task is cut down a lot. You don't see anyone injured, and you only see Harry's dragon, and the miniature of Fleur's.
4. Neville gives Harry the Gillyweed instead of Doby.
5. They never reveal Rita Skeeter as an Animagus, and the whole side-story of Hermione trying to outsmart her is missing.
6. The maze has been changed quite a bit. There are no obstacles like the Sphinx.
7. A few characters are missing, like the house elves and Ludo Bagman.
And in general, they seem to skip from task to task, leaving out a lot of in between stuff. But that's probably for time purposes.
Wasn't the movie just 3hours?
Reread his post.Originally posted by: aznimperialx
Wasn't the movie just 3hours?
I too would prefer the movie to be longer, but that's speaking from the point of view of someone who has read and respects the books. Your average movie-goer who hasn't read the books doesn't give a shit, and just wants to see the story progress with all the cool stuff.
All the other changes that are not for time-constraint purposes...are just beyond me. Why did they decide to change stuff? Who knows.
<@Terra> he told me this, "man actually meeting terra is so fucking big", and he started crying. Then he bought me hot dogs
Just returned from the movie. I've seen the previous films, but never read any of the books. This movie seems to have lost some of the magic the previous movies had, such as the speeding bus and the flying car. I must say that the pacing of the movie seems rushed at times, and some scenes were totally boring, such as the ball, which I expected more laughs from. The only scene I thought was great was the second task underwater. The scene was great and would frighten any small kids in the theater. On the whole I was kinda disappointed with the movie, not because of the story but more of how the story is told and the pacing of the plot.
"Our hearts are full of memories but not all of them reflect the truth. The heart isn't a recording device. Even important memories change with time. They warp or fade, leaving us with but a shadow of what we hoped to remember." 天の道を行き、全てを司る。これは僕の世界。
exactly, even when they did change it around for timing, it progressed so fast that if you had not read the books it would be difficult to understand (people who just watched the movie, go read the book, you missed a lot of important stuff, especially the explaination of everything).Originally posted by: XanBcoo
Reread his post.Originally posted by: aznimperialx
Wasn't the movie just 3hours?
I too would prefer the movie to be longer, but that's speaking from the point of view of someone who has read and respects the books. Your average movie-goer who hasn't read the books doesn't give a shit, and just wants to see the story progress with all the cool stuff.
All the other changes that are not for time-constraint purposes...are just beyond me. Why did they decide to change stuff? Who knows.
I thought the movie was okay, but they left a lot of things out and didn't follow through with some of the characters, like the Asian girl. What ever happens to her?
she was a useless character in the movie
i watched it and the movie was decent i guess, but i got hella bored at the end. They skipped a hella lot of parts and i think "ava kadabra"(one hit kill to anyone with a wave of a hand and they drop dead) is such a freaking rigged spell, its like naruto's kyuubi power.
ty psj for this sig
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
