Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: UK's Anti Terror Legislation

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    UK's Anti Terror Legislation

    Tony Blair has just been defeated in his quest to increase the amount of time the police can hold a suspect without charge from 14 days to 90 days in the House of Commons. The period has been increased though to 28 days. What do you guys think of the whole ATL? Is it needed? If it were in place would it have stopped the bombings of 7/7?

  2. #2

    UK's Anti Terror Legislation

    it doesnt help so much when you hold someone with or without a charge AFTER the deeds been done. They should focus more on how to prevent it.

    As for the holding, i think its ridiculous.....if you cant charge someone within a week, then why hold them for a month? it'll just cause more racial discrimination which will inevitably result in more terrorist activities

  3. #3

    UK's Anti Terror Legislation

    On a related note, why the fuck are the USA allied with the UK? Didn't we go to war with them to gain independence from them, or as I like to say, give them the middle finger and fuck their sisters? I mean, what the fuck.

    I don't know whether you changed a pre-existing mod edit, or just impersonated a mod, but either way you've gotten yourself a warning.

    GotWoot Moderator

  4. #4
    Xeno Genesis Xollence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    42
    Posts
    1,287

    UK's Anti Terror Legislation

    Well it started with Jay's Treaty, where we basically sided with Great Britain over France, about the same time Napoleon came to power. And then of course our ties got stronger through WW1 & 2.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •