Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Bush's New Social Security Plan

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Moderator Emeritus masamuneehs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    a fountain pourin' like an avalanche, comin' down the mountain
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,874

    Bush's New Social Security Plan

    This is the real deal folks.

    Social Security (officially titled Old-Age, Disability, and Survivors Insurance -OASDI-) is the backbone of America's social policy. Due to the current makeup of the laws and the impending retirement of the "Baby Boomers", the generation coming out of the post-WWII years, the program will soon run a deficit. It will be impossible, or extremely damaging, to continue to maintain the Social Security program over the next couple decades. By the time I am eligible to recieve Social Security (65-20 = 45 years) the program is expected to fail its payment to me.

    I present to you, with no strings attached, the one-hundred-percent certified, notorized and unaltered proposal that President George W. Bush of the United States of America is asking the Republican-headed Congress of the USA to vote into law.

    H. R. 3304: Growing Real Ownership for Workers Act of 2005
    http://www.theorator.com/bills109/hr3304.html

    Congressional Budgeting Office's analysis of the proposed Social Security Plan
    http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm...ex=6645&sequence=0

    The Congressional Budgeting Office (CBO) is the U.S's accountant, it is in charge of assessing and often fixing the required rates of taxes, and government expenditures.

    Social security taxes account for the largest amount of money paid to the government by the majority of American housholds. I lose about 10% of my income (and that is at the lowest possible income-bracket to be taxed) to Social Security. That money is immediatley being spent on the current senior citizens and used by the US government as a sort of cash-on-hand benefit that it can do what it pleases with until my time to retire comes. The fact that I (and every other U.S. citizen) pay into a program that needs to be altered is quite alarming, and that is my reason for presenting this news to you all.

    Discuss if you will, but try to at least read some of the law and analysis before puffing up your opinion as anything incredible. Hot air fills balloons quite well, but it makes for boring conversation. I for one need a good time of thinking and looking this all over before forming anything close to a properly-informed personal opinion.

    Humans are different from animals. We must die for a reason. Now is the time for us to regulate ourselves and reclaim our dignity. The one who holds endless potential and displays his strength and kindness to the world. Only mankind has God, a power that allows us to go above and beyond what we are now, a God that we call "possibility".

  2. #2

    Bush's New Social Security Plan

    There are far more effects when and if the SS changes are brought into fruitation. It will not only affect senior citizens, but the "poor" as well. SS does not only cover the elderly, but it is also for the medicaid and medicare. As if the poor don't have it bad enough, now he wants to get rid of what little health insurance they can get. I realize that some people in this country are just lazy, but there ARE some people who are just "stuck" in poverty. Further, Bush ideally, wants us to invest our own income to create our own retirement fund (something in addition to the 401k and other IRA's). How? Well, he really likes the stock market for one. The problem that I have with this, as do many of my accounting professors is that the stock market is inconsistent.

    So to all who care, these changes have far more affects than one may think. It does affect everyone in a way, but some moreso adversely.

  3. #3
    Moderator Emeritus Assertn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    41
    Posts
    11,053

    Bush's New Social Security Plan

    Care to summarize the bullet points of that article? I've dealt with interpreting legal documents enough to know that there's usually about 2/3s semantic bullshit and 1/3 of actual useful information that is conveniently worded in a way that takes too much effort to interpret.
    10/4/04 - 8/20/07

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •