View Full Version : Sword Art Online Comparisons between the Light Novel and the Anime
Dark Dragon
Sat, 08-04-2012, 08:57 PM
I am making this thread to contain discussion for SAO anime comparisons, especially now that the anime is airing. It is not a good idea to discuss comparisons in the anime thread, so this should serve as a net for that.
Now for a gripe...
I am really pissed at how much technical details they are omitting in the anime. Without all that detail, particularly in the MMO aspect of this story, it is just another generic shounen harem action show.
The problem i have right now isn't so much the actual adaptation of the novel chapters. I just do not agree with this approach to telling the story in chronological order. A lot of these side chapters could've easily fit into an OVA and i feel like they're wasting too many episodes on them. My problem is with the pacing of the story as a whole.
I'm pretty sure i'm done with watching the Anime.
Whoever is directing it seems to have a pretty bid grudge for pacing, because it has effectively been killed.
Edit: I wonder if the anime would be better if i wait until it finished and watch it in the order from the novel.
shinta|hikari
Tue, 08-14-2012, 07:12 PM
While I share your complaints, I think those negative qualities should deter non-readers than readers. They are the ones suffering from it, while as a reader, I can just enjoy the animated and voiced version of the story I originally liked anyway.
Dark Dragon
Tue, 08-14-2012, 09:00 PM
I'll definitely rewatch this in the order i like when the whole thing is done. I just feel like there's no point to follow it on a weekly basis right now.
shinta|hikari
Tue, 08-14-2012, 09:48 PM
I just find it sad that SAO is being torn apart in GW because of the hype. Yes, I love it, but it is still a harem, shounen story. It isn't a masterpiece with unforeseeable twists and completely unconventional development, but it is great for what it is.
Even my favorite arc GGO isn't that complex of a story, and a lot of interesting aspects are left unexplored. However, it had really cool action and interesting new rules, so I love it.
It is evident that the SAO anime is being judged using a completely different standard compared to other shows. Negative aspects that are tolerated in other shows currently airing are being crucified in the SAO forum, and the really good parts are glossed over or ignored even if similar traits are highly praised in other shows.
Dark Dragon
Tue, 08-14-2012, 10:53 PM
It's always the case when something is extremely popular and is deemed "over-hyped" by the people who doesn't like it.
The anime is definitely pretty mediocre so far just judging from only the contents showed, but it really doesn't deserve all the hate it's getting. I just feels like some people in that thread are determined to hate the show just because there are some novel readers who are ready and willing to defend it. It's just one of those things that is best left alone.
Maybe the SAO anime is just a victim of the overwhelming popularity of the novels.
shinta|hikari
Tue, 08-14-2012, 11:03 PM
That is why I quit way ahead of all the other novel readers. I have experienced this type of bashing on a lot of popular adaptations because I tend to read the source material (VN, LN, manga, etc.) before watching the show, but never have I seen more nitpicking and ridiculous evaluations/interpretations than in the SAO thread.
I think people tend to over read into the anime, and I find it really funny. Some things should just be taken at face value (i.e. Kirito's explanations, feelings). It's like seeing people try to derive the meaning of ethics and morality from pokemon.
Y
Wed, 08-15-2012, 06:09 PM
The Sword Art Online novels are sub-forum post level writing. I dropped the first one after being totally unable to get through the prose. Also, it's ridiculous for you to come posting shit like this in the novel thread just because you've got some kind of crazy misplaced elitism from reading a "novel" written for an internet contest.
shinta|hikari
Wed, 08-15-2012, 06:30 PM
Please be satisfied messing with only 1 thread.
I do agree that SAO writing is not stellar, like I said in my previous posts. It is what it is, and people just seem to hold it to some higher standard because of the hype.
Y
Wed, 08-15-2012, 07:08 PM
Please be satisfied messing with only 1 thread.
It's great that you appreciate this show and the book, I can definitely understand being a fan. As I said after the first episode, it has a certain pleasant charm and the animation and art are, if a bit bland stylistically, certainly more than servicable. But it's a very flawed work and the protagonist as portrayed is an absolutely dreadful character. Characterizing my criticism of the show as just "messing" with a thread is extremely misleading and inaccurate.
shinta|hikari
Wed, 08-15-2012, 07:50 PM
I absolutely disagree with your analysis on the character of the protagonist for reasons already mentioned by others in the other thread. I saw your arguments as simply messing around, but if you weren't, I take it back.
Moving on.
Y
Thu, 08-16-2012, 01:14 PM
I absolutely disagree with your analysis on the character of the protagonist for reasons already mentioned by others in the other thread. I saw your arguments as simply messing around, but if you weren't, I take it back.
Moving on.
Similarly, as already mentioned in the previous thread, your view on the anime portrayal of the character is informed by the internal narrative present in the book. The book Kirito is more plainly a Mary Sue style shounen hero. Without that internal narration, the show Kirito is a much different person. You can't just assume all the narration from the book shapes the character in the show as well.
shinta|hikari
Thu, 08-16-2012, 06:26 PM
Buff seems to get it just fine even without the internal narration. Let's agree to disagree.
Why is the Alicization Running novel taking so long to get translated? Are they going to release it in one go?
MasterOfMoogles
Thu, 08-16-2012, 10:22 PM
Just because a character's internal narration isn't shown doesn't mean he is a totally different character. Instead, it just means you don't see his thoughts. I guess you can make up reasons for his behavior that aren't true to his character and act like they're true, but it seems like the only reason to do that is to annoy people who know the real character. Nobody cares if people speculate about his character, but to say he's a selfish, heartless bastard because he did X and not considering other reasons why he did X is just pointless.
Y
Thu, 08-16-2012, 10:37 PM
Just because a character's internal narration isn't shown doesn't mean he is a totally different character. Instead, it just means you don't see his thoughts. I guess you can make up reasons for his behavior that aren't true to his character and act like they're true, but it seems like the only reason to do that is to annoy people who know the real character.
This is a tremendously stupid and reductionist way to read things. Omitting the narration is an element of the show, and not having the protagonist spew hackneyed garbage about how he's going to be the one to save the world does make him a different (and not necessarily a lesser) character. Compare this to Kubrick eliminating the final chapter of A Clockwork Orange when he adapted it - you don't just assume that the omitted material happened anyway, omitting it made the character different.
Buff seems to get it just fine even without the internal narration.
"Getting it" isn't the deal here, bucko. We're not wrong because he acted or thought differently in the book, or even because you could interpret the character in a different light in the show. Hope this helps.
shinta|hikari
Fri, 08-17-2012, 12:34 AM
"Getting it" is the deal here. You say he is a different character in the show, but Buff, who is not a novel reader, interprets him just like the character in the novels. Your argument that novel readers are only seeing Kirito differently from you because they have extra knowledge does not stand.
You have a different opinion of Kirito from what you have seen in the anime, and I respect that. You just have to realize that Kirito can in fact be seen as a nice guy who helps people out even without novel knowledge. That is what I meant when I said "Let's agree to disagree."
Please refrain from name calling in your posts.
Ryllharu
Fri, 08-17-2012, 03:25 AM
Just because one person has an interpretation that matches your own doesn't automatically make all other interpretations that you disagree with false.
With the novels, there is only one interpretation about Kirito's motivations because you are actually told directly what they are via first party account. That information is missing from the anime. Thus, both interpretations are valid there because Kirito has practically been a silent protagonist. Due to his actions in early episodes, the audience can't even be sure he's isn't lying to other people.
MasterOfMoogles
Fri, 08-17-2012, 04:01 AM
having the protagonist spew hackneyed garbage about how he's going to be the one to save the world
I have to wonder if we even read the same novel.
We're not wrong because he acted or thought differently in the book, or even because you could interpret the character in a different light in the show.
Since he acts the exact same as in the book and you don't see his thoughts in the anime, I don't understand why you keep saying that he's a different character. He's only different if you make up motivations and thoughts for him that are different from the book. Everyone is free to do that, but you can't act like the ones you've created have any kind of priority over others.
both interpretations are valid there because Kirito has practically been a silent protagonist.
Exactly. What I don't understand is why when someone says "Kirito could actually be a nice guy because maybe he's doing this and this because of that" it is okay to say "No, that's wrong."
Is it really not fair to throw out the other side of the argument when everyone is suggesting Kirito is a deranged psychopath?
Buffalobiian
Fri, 08-17-2012, 04:11 AM
Just because one person has an interpretation that matches your own doesn't automatically make all other interpretations that you disagree with false.
That's correct, and exactly what Shinta said:
You have a different opinion of Kirito from what you have seen in the anime, and I respect that.
On the other hand, what shinta addressed was:
Your argument that novel readers are only seeing Kirito differently from you because they have extra knowledge does not stand.
I would infer that he is referring to a comment Y (supposedly) made saying that only LN readers could see Kirito as a nice guy (I think I recall him saying it in a more passive manner, such as "(Kirito being a nice guy) can only be seen that way if you had prior knowledge from the novels".
In any case, going with the above information it would seem to me that Y is the one making absolute statements.
edit: I googled "bucko" and the results seem to range in how offensive the word is. Seems like another use of the word "buddy" or something.. but hey, it can be interpreted offensively, so if taken as such I'd say it's best to stop.
Ryllharu
Fri, 08-17-2012, 04:22 AM
Except as I watch the anime, I can't see Kirito as anything but a sociopath, or at the very least antisocial to the point of basically being deranged.
My point isn't that one or the other is correct over the other. The issue is that those who have read the novel are "tainted" (for lack of a better word) and can't seem to accept the existence of the other viewpoint. Their opinions have been set by the narration of the novel, Kirito's direct discussion of his motivations and reactions, which simply doesn't exist in the anime at all as part of the narrative.
Dark Dragon
Fri, 08-17-2012, 04:55 AM
Except as I watch the anime, I can't see Kirito as anything but a sociopath, or at the very least antisocial to the point of basically being deranged.
My point isn't that one or the other is correct over the other. The issue is that those who have read the novel are "tainted" (for lack of a better word) and can't seem to accept the existence of the other viewpoint. Their opinions have been set by the narration of the novel, Kirito's direct discussion of his motivations and reactions, which simply doesn't exist in the anime at all as part of the narrative.
It's not even that the novel readers can't accept your view points. I myself have stated multiple times that there are many problems with this adaptation. I can see how someone would have a problem with Kirito's character.
What i don't get it the absurd amount of bashing and trashing going on in the anime thread. There are many generic element that exist in a fantasy series and any long time anime watcher would be familiar with it. These same elements are often readily forgiven in another less popular anime, but with SAO every small problem is magnified and made out to be a big deal.
There's also trolls like Y.
He claims that he's not messing around, yet almost every response to something he doesn't agree with usually involves an insult. He start arguments by intentionally saying derogatory things in order to provoke a response. Then he would neg rep every person that disagree with him and state that he did it just because some anonymous neg rep him. For good measure, it seems like he needs to jump into this thread and pull it into a pile of horseshit too because there isn't already enough conflict in the anime thread.
That's all i really have to say about Y. I refuse to waste anymore time with his garbage so i'm ignoring his posts and will just hope for the best.
I also suggest for a mod to move this argument back into an anime thread or separate it into a GD thread. At this rate, it's just bait for anime only watcher to get spoiled.
Y
Fri, 08-17-2012, 12:47 PM
There's also trolls like Y.
He claims that he's not messing around, yet almost every response to something he doesn't agree with usually involves an insult. He start arguments by intentionally saying derogatory things in order to provoke a response. Then he would neg rep every person that disagree with him and state that he did it just because some anonymous neg rep him. For good measure, it seems like he needs to jump into this thread and pull it into a pile of horseshit too because there isn't already enough conflict in the anime thread.
That's all i really have to say about Y. I refuse to waste anymore time with his garbage so i'm ignoring his posts and will just hope for the best.
I laid out my points very succinctly in discussions, and in return I was slapped by anonymous negative replies, posts with no substance insisting I was just trolling, and people like yourself and shinta|hikari retreating to a thread you assumed I and others with negative opinions wouldn't post in to snidely talk shit in this manner. But, of course, this isn't trolling, having the wrong opinion about a Japanese TV show is.
Plenty of my complaints have nothing to do with my apparently radical interpretation of a shut-in loser addicted to MMO games as an antisocial person. The weakness in the mystery script. The creepy, bizarre "sister-cousin lookalike gets almost fondled by tentacles" episode. The disconnected feeling of the early stories, which pretty much every novel reader agreed with and even provided the reasons for (telling the stories out of order without making them fit the character arc). I might be alone in saying I find the house art style bland but is that really such a deranged opinion that it must be presented only to troll you?
There's also the argument that people are being unduly harsh because the show is "too popular" and I feel it's "over-hyped". I picked this show up because I thought the premise was fun having no idea that the book was one of the more popular light-novel series or that the show came with great anticipation, not that those factors are in any way relevant to the quality of the show or lack thereof. I thought the first episode was good enough to keep watching and I thought subsequent episodes had several notable issues. The fact that my posts are typically something negative about the episode is not because I'm just trying to piss you off, it's how I analyze and critique media I'm consuming.
I have to wonder if we even read the same novel.
If you value your life above all else, staying in a village and waiting for somebody else to clear the game is the wisest route to take. But I go to the front lines every day solo. Am I just simply an addict of VRMMO who keeps increasing his stats through countless battles, or—
Am I an idiot who insolently believes that he can win the freedom of everyone in this world with his sword?
Please refrain from name calling in your posts.
What name calling? "Bucko" is, as Buff said, a term like "buddy". I'm calling MasterOfMoogles reading paradigm stupid and reductionist, not him.
MasterOfMoogles
Fri, 08-17-2012, 09:03 PM
Y, whether you meant to or not, you have set a tone in most of your posts that is very negative to discussion and to other users.
Here is a good example from the other thread:
You guys must be letting your perspective from reading the books fuck your judgment up. Kirito in the first episode expressed understanding and sympathy to the goals of the crazy, mass murdering game designer. Yes, that's right. The only sense of emotional connection he formed in the first four episodes is with the greatest mass murderer in history. This is your altruistic hero, assclowns.
So you start off by saying everyone has fucked up judgment. A little harsh, but ok, maybe you can explain it.
Next, you say something that is basically untrue. In Episode 1, Kirito is clearly angry when Kayaba is laying out the rules of the game. Kirito explains he admired Kayaba (and who wouldn't? The guy is a genius that made VR a reality!) as a way to explain how he understood he was telling the truth. The reason Kirito knows what Kayaba says is true isn't because he agrees with him or anything, it is because Kirito followed information about this awesome developer, so he knew that he said some pretty strange things as shown by the article that is cut to briefly.
So to anyone who takes everything said at face value or read the novels, you read into something that wasn't there, and then you top off the post by insulting everyone.
I'm not saying you can't have an opinion, but when you make a post like this and then basically tell everyone that disagrees that they're crazy, it just doesn't do anything for good discussion. You shouldn't be surprised if people don't like your posts or think you're trolling when you call everyone an assclown at the end.
If you value your life above all else, staying in a village and waiting for somebody else to clear the game is the wisest route to take. But I go to the front lines every day solo. Am I just simply an addict of VRMMO who keeps increasing his stats through countless battles, or—
Am I an idiot who insolently believes that he can win the freedom of everyone in this world with his sword?
As I started walking towards the labyrinth entrance with a slight smile of self-scorn, I thought back to that day.
Kirito is questioning his own motives, and he even thinks it is ridiculous that he might be doing it to be a hero. I wouldn't really call that "spewing hackneyed garbage about how he's going to be the one to save the world".
Y
Fri, 08-17-2012, 11:13 PM
Y, whether you meant to or not, you have set a tone in most of your posts that is very negative to discussion and to other users.
Just about every reply in that thread, the anonymous negative reps, and several posts in this thread all tell me to stop posting. This is a literal, not a figurative, attempt to stifle discussion. In this very thread people are attempting to get mods to shut down discussion and ghetto it off to the anime thread so that they can sit in here and make passive-aggressive comments about how unenlightened the anime viewers are. That, again, is a literal attempt to stifle discussion.
I made a followup post citing the rationale behind that initial post, which you pointedly did not reply to.
Kirito is questioning his own motives, and he even thinks it is ridiculous that he might be doing it to be a hero. I wouldn't really call that "spewing hackneyed garbage about how he's going to be the one to save the world".
I would. Because it is. The prose in SAO is miserable.
MasterOfMoogles
Sat, 08-18-2012, 02:46 AM
I'm not telling you to stop posting, just to not always be looking down on other people posting and insulting them. Again, maybe that is not your intention, but that is the tone of your posts.
Regarding the content, since I don't read the forum and post all the time, I felt like I missed the window to comment since everyone had moved on to arguing about other stuff. Also, in my opinion you were further reading into Kirito's "I read a lot about him so I understand he's serious" to reach a conclusion that he understood why Kayaba would do it, which to me doesn't logically follow at all.
"This is reality. Kayaba Akihiko, the genius who created the NerveGear. I admired him, so I get it. What he said was the truth." Cut to quote from the article 'This is a game, but it's not just something you play.' "If I die in this world, I'll die for real."
There didn't seem to be much reason to comment since you basically called me an assclown in the previous post, so why would I even bother trying to have a real discussion.
Y
Sat, 08-18-2012, 10:10 PM
I'm not telling you to stop posting, just to not always be looking down on other people posting and insulting them.
No.
Regarding the content, since I don't read the forum and post all the time, I felt like I missed the window to comment since everyone had moved on to arguing about other stuff. Also, in my opinion you were further reading into Kirito's "I read a lot about him so I understand he's serious" to reach a conclusion that he understood why Kayaba would do it, which to me doesn't logically follow at all.
Think about it like this. He just found out the guy had arranged his videogame premier as a psychotic death trap and still thought of him as a "genius" to himself. Now you might say it's going to take him some time to lose his ingrained mental image of the game designer, but that's like hearing Hitler talk about exterminating the Jews and still think of him in your head as "the genius leader of Germany". The awe in his voice, even after the guy's crazy battle plan has been laid out, is palpable, compared to his neutral and detached tone when dealing with everything else in the world. Like I said in the other thread "I admired him, so I get it." is a completely nonsense line - you don't need to admire the crazy game creator to understand that he has created a death trap. For example, the audience understood it, probably long before any of the characters did, and none of them admire him. Taken alone, out of context, the line might not be as suggestive, but Kirito's social disconnect from the world certainly gives it a dual meaning. Kirito also treats people like objects (and in later episodes, objects like people) so, imo, the reading is perfectly sound.
MasterOfMoogles
Sun, 08-19-2012, 03:19 AM
Never heard of an evil genius? I wouldn't really use genius here, but many people recognized Hitler as a brilliant leader, even more-so when he was alive, even though what he did was a terribly atrocious crime against humanity.
I've re-watched the scene several times, and I'm just not seeing what you're talking about.
A lot of people didn't believe the game was a death trap at first, but because Kirito admired Kayaba (ie. thought he made cool stuff and read up on everything he said), he knew it was the truth.
Kirito doesn't treat people like objects. He doesn't really know how to talk to people or get along, but he always cares about their well-being (providing teleport crystals, making sure they're out of danger, etc).
I find it interesting that most of the complaints with SAO are usually that Kirito is a Gary Sue who is so perfect he is unrealistic and can do no wrong, but some people in the anime see him as a psychopath.
Buffalobiian
Sun, 08-19-2012, 05:03 AM
Okay, I've moved discussion of SAO Light Novel progression/content to another thread so that posters and readers can have a more organised discussion regarding the actual topic they're interested in.
The forum doesn't let me split posts up, so I've instead cut/pasted relevant sections and tried to put them into order.
--------------
FAQ:
1) Where can I discuss the Light novel with people? Click this to be redirected to the correct thread (http://forums.gotwoot.net/showthread.php/20885-Light-Novel-Sword-Art-Online)
2) I only want to talk about the anime. Where do I post? The SAO thread in the anime section (http://forums.gotwoot.net/showthread.php/20784-Sword-Art-Online)
3) How about if I want to compare the aired episodes of SAO with the LN portrayals? Here
4) Where do I go if I want to speculate about how LN would/could be adapted into unaired episodes, movies or other media? Click this to be redirected to the correct thread (http://forums.gotwoot.net/showthread.php/20885-Light-Novel-Sword-Art-Online)
Happy Posting
Ryllharu
Sun, 08-19-2012, 05:06 AM
@MasterOfMoogles
The problem is the change in the narrative. In the novel, Kirito tells you he's a Wesley Crusher. That all his actions are heroic, that he's a nice guy who's smart and wonderful at everything, and thinks about other before himself. If that can't be conveyed in the anime without first-party narration, that's a sign of bad writing of both the novel and the anime script.
In the anime, the best you can think of him is as someone with a hero-complex, because he doesn't act very heroic when there is no chance of his own death at Floors 25-50, and probably has Aspergers. The kind of person who runs away from his problems in real life (forcing his sister into martial arts so he gets to do what he likes), but constantly going back to lower levels to show off how strong and cool he is to the weaker players, ultimately getting them killed when he lies about it.
@Buff: This is weak. It's just pandering to a small group who want their fluff conversations to be isolated from real discussion or any criticism at all.
Buffalobiian
Sun, 08-19-2012, 05:15 AM
@Buff: This is weak. It's just pandering to a small group who want their fluff conversations to be isolated from real discussion or any criticism at all.
It's more about fine-tuning and narrowing discussion topics down.
If a thread's topic or intention is for the discussion of one medium or more, it should be entitled to. It's also arguable that Novel readers may only want to be exposed to such and not be spoiled by anime content. (That's technically spoiling, even if it's overlooked or welcome in most cases).
Ease of access for either discussion is the same as before. No one is disallowed to post about topics. They just have a new thread to do it in.
Dark Dragon
Sun, 08-19-2012, 11:19 AM
@Buff: This is weak. It's just pandering to a small group who want their fluff conversations to be isolated from real discussion or any criticism at all.
If you'll take notice, Shinta and I made 1-2 post in regard to our OPINION that the anime is not being treated fairly. While the entire first page of the previously connected thread was all LN discussion.
If you and Y really want to go through the trouble of addressing it and putting yourselves at risk for spoilers, that's your business. That was not the main point of the thread, just a very small amount of contents that offended you guys. If Shinta and I really wanted to have a "private" conversation away from any real discussion or criticism, there's this thing call PM.
It was simply frustration expressed by fans of the show, because they feel like the object of their affection is not being treated fairly. Is that really so hard to understand? Must everything that doesn't directly agree with you be some sort of attempt at ridiculing or insulting your opinion?
Ryllharu
Sun, 08-19-2012, 03:32 PM
I know it isn't the case having discussed it with Buff, but from your response here, it certainly does look like I hit the mark, doesn't it?
It was simply frustration expressed by fans of the show, because they feel like the object of their affection is not being treated fairly. Is that really so hard to understand? Must everything that doesn't directly agree with you be some sort of attempt at ridiculing or insulting your opinion?
I would have agreed with you, but you posted this:
I just feels like some people in that thread are determined to hate the show just because there are some novel readers who are ready and willing to defend it. It's just one of those things that is best left alone.
Maybe the SAO anime is just a victim of the overwhelming popularity of the novels.
A post so loaded with smarmy, self-satisfying rhetoric it was hard to ignore. Then shinta responded in kind, and then when Y interjected, he was met with dismissal and three attempts to change the subject.
It was pretty obvious which specific group of posters both of your comments were directed toward. I held back for a while, but the attitude that the thread was beginning to exude called for a response.
edit:
Regarding spoilers, with all the light novel readers shitposting all over the internet, that's not really an issue. Read a comment section covering an episode, get spoiled about an unrelated plot point. Already happened a couple of times to me so far.
Dark Dragon
Sun, 08-19-2012, 04:43 PM
I stand by what i said.
I already stated that the anime is inadequate. It's however not deserving of the large amount of criticism in the anime thread.
It was made clear from that beginning that you guys wanted to interpret the content as presented by the anime and that's fine. I can understand the desire to interpret separate mediums differently, which is why i opted out of the discussion early.
But can you honestly tell me that the amount of nitpicking in that thread is normal? Many of the tropes common in other fantasy anime is also presented in SAO. In other anime like Legend of Legendary Heroes, these tropes are merely sweep into the "generic" label and quickly forgot about while the focus of the discussion is on the merits of the anime. However in the SAO thread, everytime one of the trope shows up in an episode it is immediately criticized and the focus then becomes a long on going argument about the merits of Kirito's character.
It feels a very small number of poster in that thread is still watching the show for the sake of watching. That is how i feel and if you disagree then that's fine too.
To clarify my statement. I knew that SAO was very hype by the readers of the novels before the show came out and it was made out to be like it's going to be some amazing anime. I feel like the harsh criticism the show is receiving is partly due to how hyped the show was before it came out. I myself didn't start reading the novels until after the anime came out.
If you somehow took my statement as an insult to your interpretation of the anime then i apologize, because that was not the intent.
In regard to Y. My problem with him has nothing to do with his interpretation of the content. In fact i find the concept of viewing Kirito's as a sort of anti-hero/borderline villainous main character to be pretty interesting.
However, you neglect to acknowledge in any your post so far that he's a condescending jackass who feels the need to insults almost everyone he's having a discussion with. It's a personal pet peeve of my that makes it impossible for me to have a meaningful discussion with these type of people. It's almost akin to an atheist going around calling every religious person an idiot and then expect them to accept everything that is said afterward. That is why i didn't want to respond to any of his garbage, it has nothing to do with him disagreeing with me.
And lastly about spoilers. Regardless of whether or not is prevalent on the internet, the general rule of this forum for the longest time tends to be harsh toward spoiling. I don't know if that has gotten lax recently, but we're already going through the trouble of actually have different sub-forum for the sake of discussing different mediums. I don't see why it's a problem to leave the spoilers in the LN thread and have this thread for the discussion of this topic.
Ryllharu
Sun, 08-19-2012, 05:06 PM
But can you honestly tell me that the amount of nitpicking in that thread is normal? Many of the tropes common in other fantasy anime is also presented in SAO. In other anime like Legend of Legendary Heroes, these tropes are merely sweep into the "generic" label and quickly forgot about while the focus of the discussion is on the merits of the anime. However in the SAO thread, everytime one of the trope shows up in an episode it is immediately criticized and the focus then becomes a long on going argument about the merits of Kirito's character. For a series as dull and uninspired as this has been, it is perfectly normal. Peruse the Sacred Blacksmith (http://forums.gotwoot.net/showthread.php/17709-Sacred-Blacksmith) thread. It got a beating for its terrible lines of dialogue and asinine statements by the leads (very similar lines to things said in Sword Art), dropped by many forum members, compared as inferior to titty shows, etc.
Darker than Black 2 got ripped apart in that series thread, where I was in the same position you are now, attempting to defend it. Constant nitpicking there. Equally highly anticipated series as Sword Art, if not more so.
It feels a very small number of poster in that thread is still watching the show for the sake of watching. That is how i feel and if you disagree then that's fine too.
To clarify my statement. I knew that SAO was very hype by the readers of the novels before the show came out and it was made out to be like it's going to be some amazing anime. I feel like the harsh criticism the show is receiving is partly due to how hyped the show was before it came out. I myself didn't start reading the novels until after the anime came out. I will admit I am still watching it to figure out why it is so popular. I'm being patient, but it is wearing very thin. Sword Art has been only barely better than The Sacred Blacksmith as mentioned above, and the uniform insistence that it gets better is the only thing keeping me watching.
However, you neglect to acknowledge in any your post so far that he's a condescending jackass who feels the need to insults almost everyone he's having a discussion with. It's a personal pet peeve of my that makes it impossible for me to have a meaningful discussion with these type of people.Insults have been thrown by both sides, overt, thinly veiled, or passive-aggressively. I did not feel that merited any discussion.
MasterOfMoogles
Sun, 08-19-2012, 05:06 PM
I don't mind having the threads split since that just gives us the opportunity to talk about more stuff.
Edit: As bad as Scared Blacksmith? Really? That show was pretty terrible (except for Guard! Protect! Belive! spelling mistake which was hilarious). My anime group watched that and thought it was bad. The same group is now watching SAO (also having not read the novels) and aside from the complaints about the episodic-ness and rushed pace, they like it a lot.
In the anime, the best you can think of him is as someone with a hero-complex, because he doesn't act very heroic when there is no chance of his own death at Floors 25-50, and probably has Aspergers. The kind of person who runs away from his problems in real life (forcing his sister into martial arts so he gets to do what he likes), but constantly going back to lower levels to show off how strong and cool he is to the weaker players, ultimately getting them killed when he lies about it.
Running around with a chance of dying is not heroic, it is just stupid. I don't think anyone would disagree Kirito is socially awkward. Can you really blame him for running away from his abusive grandfather forcing him to do something he didn't want to do?
From the novels we know Kirito was at the lower levels collecting materials to upgrade his weapons, and he ran into the Black Cats and saved their lives. Obviously you're not shown that in the anime, but to say he was at the lower floors to show off is weird. You're making up stuff that suits your opinion here.
He joins the guild because he is lonely after soloing for 5-6 months, and he is afraid to tell them the truth fearing that they would hate him. Unfortunately, that leads to their demise as he doesn't give them information that could potentially have saved their lives, and he hates himself for it.
Dark Dragon
Sun, 08-19-2012, 05:14 PM
For a series as dull and uninspired as this has been, it is perfectly normal. Peruse the Sacred Blacksmith (http://forums.gotwoot.net/showthread.php/17709-Sacred-Blacksmith) thread. It got a beating for its terrible lines of dialogue and asinine statements by the leads (very similar lines to things said in Sword Art), dropped by many forum members, compared as inferior to titty shows, etc.
Fair enough, i retract my previous statement.
I will admit I am still watching it to figure out why it is so popular. I'm being patient, but it is wearing very thin. Sword Art has been only barely better than The Sacred Blacksmith as mentioned above, and the uniform insistence that it gets better is the only thing keeping me watching.
At this point, i'm not sure how much better it's going to get. We are getting back to the main storyline because they've pretty much ran out of side-story. It's too little too late because if most of the watcher of the anime feels the same way you do about Kirito then the next few episodes might not have any impact at all. Best case scenario is they'll redeem Kirito's character.
Ryllharu
Sun, 08-19-2012, 05:17 PM
From the novels we know Kirito was at the lower levels collecting materials to upgrade his weapons, and he ran into the Black Cats and saved their lives. Obviously you're not shown that in the anime, but to say he was at the lower floors to show off is weird. You're making up stuff that suits your opinion here.
He joins the guild because he is lonely after soloing for 5-6 months, and he is afraid to tell them the truth fearing that they would hate him. Unfortunately, that leads to their demise as he doesn't give them information that could potentially have saved their lives, and he hates himself for it.Had they thrown out just one, 12 second line stating any of that, it would have been better. Instead, what else are we left to believe but that he strolls through lower level areas for no reason? He clearly enjoyed showing off all his knowledge in episode 1, and appears enjoys tutoring the weak and ignorant. Usually that's done to show off. Without knowing what he's thinking, it's impossible to know he legitimately wants to help any of these people. That's a major failure in the writing (both novel and anime).
We only now learned that weapons are upgradeable, and not just straight drops replaced by other fresh drops.
MasterOfMoogles
Sun, 08-19-2012, 05:29 PM
I don't think anyone is going to disagree that the adaptation could have been a lot better.
What'd everyone think about the Warmth of the Heart adaptation?
Seemed pretty decent, about on par with Scilica's story.
They cut out a few things from the end to leave some suspense for next episode, which I think is fine.
shinta|hikari
Thu, 09-13-2012, 11:16 AM
I have been reading the recent comments about how the anime is progressing, and I find most of them were addressed by novel volumes that will likely not get animated.
The Kuradeel episode was actually pretty close to the novel, with Kirito not showing much guilt for killing someone. But this was addressed in Phantom Bullet, where it was explained that Kirito was merely running away from the guilt, and eventually had to face it. This will never show up in the anime though, making Kirito seem like a pretty cold one-sided bastard.
I am glad that the anime is going in chronological order at least for the next arc. The Yui character was the biggest and stupidest retcon in the story, and at least this time it will show in a more logical sequence.
MasterOfMoogles
Fri, 09-14-2012, 03:43 AM
If only they had another 3-5 minutes each episode, the show would be significantly better, which is unfortunate. In this episode, for example, you could have had the scene where they go to Heathcliff and explain what happened and that they're leaving the guild for a while before they head to Asuna's house. Small scenes like that would be enough to tie everything together and not leave people wondering what is going on or thinking things like "Wow, they didn't even acknowledge people died". It is frustrating that to fully enjoy the show you need to think about or assume what happens off-screen, and not many people are willing to do that and instead assume it is just bad.
That said, the latest episodes have still been pretty good. The duel was fairly well done and the Kirito/Asuna dynamics are fun to watch.
At some point, when someone is trying to kill you and the people you love, you have to do something about it or lose something important. He already attacked Asuna after being given a chance once. Would you try to take him into custody? Would you let him run away if he tried? If he kept trying to attack would you finish him or just run away? It is easy to say what you would do, but I don't know what I would do in such a situation.
I like Yui, so I'm glad she's showing up here. I'm curious as to how they're going to cut her story to fit in one episode. Really though, I am just waiting for the 75th floor boss fight, which should hopefully be epic.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.